Closed KlementineJBS closed 10 months ago
Code | Solvent | Present? | Ratio | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | DMF | KBS-17-12-A_2-A,8_1_696.pdf | SM, mono, bis | 11: 100 :28 | 8:72:20 |
B | 1,4-dioxane | KBS-17-12-B_2-B,1_1_697.pdf | SM | 100 | 100 |
C | MeCN | KBS-17-12-C_2-B,2_1_698.pdf | SM, mono, bis | 59: 100 : 82 | 25:41:34 |
D | THF | KBS-17-12-D_2-B,3_1_699.pdf | SM, mono, bis | 76: 100 :18 | 39:52:9 |
E | DCM | KBS-17-12-E_2-B,4_1_700.pdf | SM | 100:6:5 | 90:5:5 |
Low result for DCM may be due to solvent evaporating before reaction could progress sufficiently. May be worth redoing, but only if MeCN proves a poor choice.
MeCN had highest conversion to desired bis product, but DMF had higher overall conversion (i.e. to either mono or bis product). Future work should investigate using MeCN as a solvent. Perks of MeCN include that it is easier to dry/keep dry than DMF.
Link to HIRAC, original method and master page.
Last attempt is #51.
KBS17 Generic propargylation of 1,n-diamine.docx