search

Klepac-Ceraj-Lab / Resonance

MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Clarify moving Table 4 to supp #150

Closed Hugemiler closed 1 year ago

Hugemiler commented 1 year ago

@vanjakle I'm trying to understand your comment in table 4 of the manuscript:

Supplementary table?

We already have a supplementary table, Table S2, which has all 70 rows for all brain segments, and we thought this would be just a summary to show the distribution of performance. Your suggestion is to move this to supplement as well and give no indication of this distribution on the main text?

vanjakle commented 1 year ago

Leave it in the main text for now then and let’s see why the reviewers will say. It was just a suggestion and if you prefer to leave it in the main text, that’s ok with me. Vanja

Sent from my iPhone. Sorry for typos.

On Mar 28, 2023, at 10:28 PM, Guilherme Fahur Bottino < @.***> wrote:



@vanjakle https://github.com/vanjakle I'm trying to understand your comment in table 4 of the manuscript:

Supplementary table?

We already have a supplementary table, Table S2, which has all 70 rows for all brain segments, and we thought this would be just a summary to show the distribution of performance. Your suggestion is to move this to supplement as well and give no indication of this distribution on the main text?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Klepac-Ceraj-Lab/Resonance/issues/150, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANAUXAV7L245F3VSJ4RITDTW6NCWLANCNFSM6AAAAAAWLB23RA . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>

Hugemiler commented 1 year ago

Will do. Thank you for clarifying.