Closed jabby09 closed 4 months ago
comment from Brendan
it's because that project value is a huge number Normally its VCS-191 Probably passing the wrong value down there
comment from Peter
I actually made this change in the subgraph to change that ICR project id to the standard format, but it hasnt' been approved, merged or deployed yet. But that should solve that issue
See https://github.com/KlimaDAO/klima-subgraph/pull/115 which should fix the receipt
@psparacino This appears in the codebase twice:
// temporary fix until ICR digital-carbon id matches registry-registryProjectId format
if (retirement.retire.credit.project.registry === "ICR") {
retirement.retire.credit.project.projectID =
retirement.retire.credit.project.id;
}
reminder to clean that up when the subgraph fix goes in
will leave this open until confirmed that subgraph change https://github.com/KlimaDAO/klima-subgraph/pull/115 fixes the receipts without a need for any FE updates
this is now resolved https://www.carbonmark.com/retirements/0x6476edf98bdc5ee62f9d4e4bf8932d69ed685483/48
ICR projects are breaking our receipt design, see https://www.carbonmark.com/retirements/0x6476edf98bdc5ee62f9d4e4bf8932d69ed685483/44 for example
does not seem to be maintaining the equal 2 column layout.
PDF layout seems fine. retirement_44_0x6476edf98bdc5ee62f9d4e4bf8932d69ed685483 (3).pdf