Closed Canialon closed 1 year ago
Sounds good. Most of those were me from my bash scripts! I'm not sure about the jq bit though - users would need to install it and windows is "special". In future we'll have multi-language examples so it will all be a bit different, but consistent variable names is a good enhancement.
It is just a future request to make the docs easier to read. It is a lot of
moments and I guess it is not understandable for the user what $1, $2, and $3... mean. I do propose to make it like this
or any other way where the user will get that he/she should change something in command and what exactly should input there.
Also, another moment I want to add
| jq
at the end of every command to get a readable response.PS: If this future request makes sense I do want to take it.