Open smk762 opened 1 year ago
i like this idea.
a way to filter the display with a minimum volume would be nice when the orderbook gets saturated with a lot of small orders.
with min_volume
, max_volume
you can make whale version or minnow versions just with different min and max values.
but min_volume
is all that is needed as you can always match a smaller amount than an order has.
when there are hundreds of small orders it becomes painful to have to scroll through them.
From here:
I don't see a proper pagination mechanism, which we definitely need to implement. It's worth considering this while working on the issue.
As the size of orderbooks grow, the time taken to get a response and go through the book increases. Currently the legacy orderbook param only accepts base / rel as inputs. The v2 bestorders method has some additional params to
request_by
volume or number. It would be a great boost to UX if the orderbook request would allow some filtering. E.g.cc: @cipig