Visibility Dialog - Githubissues

Kompakkt / Repo

Repository for Kompakkt, the Web Based multimodal 3D Viewer and 3D Annotation System.

https://kompakkt.de

GNU Affero General Public License v3.0

12 stars 2 forks source link

Visibility Dialog #20

Open Grizzly127 opened 1 year ago

Grizzly127 commented 1 year ago

Suggestion for the visibility dialog

before:

after:

"Online status" is about if the object is published or not. Since we use "Publish" at the object view to make an object visible for others, I would suggest using "Publish" here too.

[ ] Can we use only one search field? Or do we need two for groups and persons? @HeyItsBATMAN
[ ] It looks better to have only one shadow and not three, is this possible to change?
[ ] Does it make sense to use "whitelist"? Is there a place where you can see or edit a whitelist? -> I would suggest to use the option "Publish only for configured persons/groups". Like this the "Who is able to see my object?" information is not necessary in my opinion.
[ ] Changing "submit" to "save" ?
[ ] Change the position of the buttons.

@HeyItsBATMAN @ZetOE @lozanaross

HeyItsBATMAN commented 1 year ago

I think this is a good attempt at reducing the cognitive load of this form, but maybe it can be simplified even further?

Like, instead of having 2 sliders, this logic could be split into a selection of 3 options:

Private (only visible to the current user)
Restricted (visible to selected persons and groups)
Public (visible to everyone)

Then the person/group selection could be hidden if the object is set to private or public, since it's not needed in those cases anyways.

This is a similar case to the annotation access selection when editing a compilation, as shown in this mockup I did a while back (though I now think Private, Restricted & Public are catchier words):

Can we use only one search field? Or do we need two for groups and persons?

This can be combined into one search bar, and this could be done anywhere where groups and persons can be selected.

Grizzly127 commented 11 months ago

I like the idea. I tried to implement it:

Do we need more description (like who can annotate now)? Or do you think it is clear with the words "Private" "Public" and "Restricted"?

lozanaross commented 11 months ago

I think this looks good & the categories public / private / restricted make sense and can be explained in the new version of the collaboration page. We just need to update the action buttons as per our latest discussion @Grizzly127, otherwise I think this issue can be moved to be on the priority list (@HeyItsBATMAN).

Grizzly127 commented 11 months ago

here is the latest version with the new secondary button: