Kompakkt / Repo

Repository for Kompakkt, the Web Based multimodal 3D Viewer and 3D Annotation System.
https://kompakkt.de
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
12 stars 2 forks source link

UI sync semantic kompakkt and kompakkt Metadata #42

Open Grizzly127 opened 3 weeks ago

Grizzly127 commented 3 weeks ago

Metadata next to the object

I noticed that the information for the object view are very different in kompakkt and sk. In terms of what kind of information you can see and especially the “Persons and Institutions”/“Related agents” section. This issue is to discuss and decide which information is important here and how we decide to make it consistent in kompakkt and sk?

sk right now:

Bildschirmfoto 2024-06-07 um 12 42 20

kompakkt right now:

Bildschirmfoto 2024-06-07 um 12 41 41

“Related agents” sk:

Bildschirmfoto 2024-06-06 um 18 29 12

“Persons and Institutions” kompakkt:

Bildschirmfoto 2024-06-06 um 18 29 32

@lozanaross @ZetOE

Grizzly127 commented 3 weeks ago

Upload Metadata

We should also discuss how the Upload of the Metadata should look like, it is also very different:

kompakkt:

Bildschirmfoto 2024-06-12 um 15 26 01

sk:

Bildschirmfoto 2024-06-12 um 15 25 22

persons in kompakkt: (also it is not clear what is mandatory and what not, you have to give a contact person for example, but it is not clear to the user, that this information is needed) kompakkt:

Bildschirmfoto 2024-06-12 um 15 28 05

sk:

Bildschirmfoto 2024-06-12 um 15 30 54

@lozanaross @ZetOE

lozanaross commented 2 weeks ago

Metadata next to the object

I noticed that the information for the object view are very different in kompakkt and sk. In terms of what kind of information you can see and especially the “Persons and Institutions”/“Related agents” section. This issue is to discuss and decide which information is important here and how we decide to make it consistent in kompakkt and sk?

Thanks Senya, this is a good issue to resolve. I think we should aim to align this part of the presentation thus:

Can you make two new mockups based on the above and paste one here for Kompakkt changes & one also in SK / Gitlab issue for the SK changes that need to be made there.

lozanaross commented 2 weeks ago

Upload Metadata

We should also discuss how the Upload of the Metadata should look like, it is also very different:

Thanks for this comment @Grizzly127 - I think we should vote which option we like better - a vertical or horizontal wizard and align both to the same style. @HeyItsBATMAN @ZetOE - what's your opinion here?

I personally I like the "horizontal" style of the SK version a bit better (the other long scroll thing somehow seems endless and might put users off of exploring all options), but perhaps it's also a matter of making the data a bit more lean for Kompakkt (I think in SK we already reduced it a lot, so nothing to cut here, but perhaps we can also add some new bits here especially when it comes to possibility to add new people, or new things in the database if they are not already findable with the search option). If there is less data entry fields, then maybe the long scroll is also not so bad.

By making the data more lean, I mean for example all these fields under General Information:

Statement Object type Tags Discipline

We don't have these in SK, and I wonder what's their function and how many people use them? @HeyItsBATMAN @ZetOE do you have any remarks here - I feel like I've never seen tags or discipline being used as navigation / exploration filters, so what are they for?

If we go through all metadata fields one by one and identify if some can be cut, then perhaps you can try a redesigned mockup @Grizzly127 that puts Kompakkt's structure in something that looks more like SK? Or vice versa. If the Kompakkt's structure is simplified, we can try to put SK's wizard into the long form scroll.

HeyItsBATMAN commented 2 weeks ago

I think we should vote which option we like better - a vertical or horizontal wizard and align both to the same style. @HeyItsBATMAN @ZetOE - what's your opinion here?

I'm strongly in favor of the SK style. The long scroll of Kompakkt really complicates things, and also makes it unnecessarily difficult to see what's missing.

Statement Object type Tags Discipline

@ZetOE can probably tell more about the purposes of each of those. But I think the design of SK can be applied to Kompakkt even without removing fields.

Grizzly127 commented 2 weeks ago

Update Metadata next to the object

Thanks Senya, this is a good issue to resolve. I think we should aim to align this part of the presentation thus (...)

The order for the information next to the object in kompakkt is now this: License - Related persons and institutions - External links

Bildschirmfoto 2024-06-18 um 15 20 18

Can we align the information options with the title above and use a 32px padding right and left of the information card?

In kompakkt we need to change the license information like this then it is the same like in sk:

Bildschirmfoto 2024-06-18 um 15 20 40

before I continue to make the Related persons and institutions information looking good, just one question for the Contact address information. Is there for every person/institute behind their role? (That means that it sometimes is repeated) or is there one information for who is the contact person/institution?

one person with two roles: left: contact address repeated, right: role as contact person with address

Bildschirmfoto 2024-06-18 um 15 26 00

one person and one institution having a role: left: one person and one institution have a role and contact addresses, right: the institution functions as contact person

Bildschirmfoto 2024-06-18 um 15 26 49

@lozanaross