Closed doy-pin closed 3 months ago
Yes, the values are relative abundances, they should sum to 1.0.
I do not think there is any direct way to convert the values into a gross copy number. Doing so requires us to be able to definitively say that a KO is present x number of times, whereas, in the metagenome data, pieces of the genes in the KOs are present in a scattered (and perhaps messy) manner.
Hi,
Can you confirm if the values are relative abundance and is there a way to convert them into copies per million?