Closed alytle closed 5 years ago
Hi Alytle:
I agree the --confirm
behavior is not ideal behavior in this case, it should ask once for every stack, I'll try to fix this.
Regarding specifying change sets
, you can add back commands like changeset list
, changeset describe
. The changeset feature was in earlier version but eventually replaced with sync
as I'm focusing on assist writing template for this tool.
-- Kotaimen
Ok, I wasn't sure if you were opposed to the changeset command being re-introduced. I like the sync
command, but sometimes you just need a changeset itself. I'll take a stab at a PR this week.
Edit: I found --ignore-missing shortly after writing this. I'd suggest this should be made a default :)
Also, and I'm not sure if this is worth including in a separate issue, but a good number of "error" states are specific only to a given stack, and not the entire plan.
For example:
cfn-cli -s dev.* stack deploy
)cfn-cli -s dev.* stack delete
)cfn-cli -s dev.* stack delete
), but I get an error:An error occurred (ValidationError) when calling the DescribeStacks operation: Stack with id foobar-dev does not exist
Really the plan should continue, given that the end result was that the Stack should be deleted, and it is already in that state.
--ingore-missing
option is kinda of an after thought and default to disabled so the previous behavior is not changed.
Hey folks,
When I run
cfn-cli stack sync --confirm
, I often just want to inspect the change set, and not execute it. The --confirm option helps here, but if I have multiple stacks, when I get to this point:The program exits when I hit no. I'd like it to continue progressing through the rest of the stacks in question. Do you think this should be a default behaviour? If not, I'd be fine with a parameter override to get the behaviour in question.
Additionally, it doesn't seem like the output of Change Sets is accessible after the
sync
command completes? Would you be open to a PR there to be able to revisit an existing Change Set?