Open Binarus opened 2 years ago
Really nobody? Not even a "Won't Fix"?
Hm, this sounds like a new feature.
What you are looking for is the property "CLASS".
In an event it could look like
CLASS:CONFIDENTIAL
, CLASS:PRIVATE
like the example from the spec below. Default is CLASS:PUBLIC
.
The following is an example of the "VEVENT" calendar
component used to represent a meeting that will also be opaque to
searches for busy time:
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:19970901T130000Z-123401@example.com
DTSTAMP:19970901T130000Z
DTSTART:19970903T163000Z
DTEND:19970903T190000Z
SUMMARY:Annual Employee Review
CLASS:PRIVATE
CATEGORIES:BUSINESS,HUMAN RESOURCES
END:VEVENT
The documentation for that property is here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5545#section-3.8.1.3 .
I looked into the code and did not find a place where this property is respected in any way.
This would be a cool new feature! Thanks for finding this behaviour.
radicale so far has no mechanism included to honor information in ICS for the ACL layer - also not planned so far because this can turn somehow difficult without storing the user on server side into ICS in an extra attribute and honor this later on filtering on handout.
At first, thanks for Radicale! I found it exceptionally easy to deploy on a Windows Server, and it works great in general. However, we're having the following problem:
We have multiple Thunderbird users and have created one calendar per user in Radicale. The objective is to let every user write and read his own calendar and let every user read the calendars of all other users. This works so far.
Problem
But when a user marks an event as "Private", other users still can see that event, including all details. This should not be the case.
For example, in Thunderbird, when creating an event, there is a "Privacy" dropdown button which can be used to mark the event to be "Public Event", "Show Time and Date only" or "Private Event". However, even when we choose "Private Event" there, the event with all details is visible for all other users.
I believe that this problem is due to Radicale, not to Thunderbird.
I have got that impression because I have seen similar issue reports for OwnCloud where it was explained that the problem was due to certain parts of CalDAV data not being evaluated correctly by the backend, or being ignored; OwnCloud was fixed to correct this a short time later.
There seems to be a "CLASS" field in CalDAV data, and I can imagine that Radicale ignores that field as well. Is there any way to get around it , or can it be fixed?
Please note that I don't have much experience with CalDAV yet, so my statement that the problem is due to Radicale may be wrong. In that case, I'd be grateful if somebody could shed some light on the matter.
Thank you very much in advance!
Steps to reproduce:
owner_write
right type.Private
(using thePrivacy
dropdown field besides the lock symbol in the area below the menu bar in Thunderbird's event creation dialog)