Allowing Blink to manage LN but not on-chain transactions creates two separate balances.
Blink seems to only have LN receiving, but this effectively acts as a separate plugin for custodial balances, similar to Kraken's.
Perhaps it would be best to consolidate, with differing support for what is possible.
For example, even if Blink only exposes LN integration, the same plugin could allow on-chain transactions to be received by Kraken and LN transactions to be received by Blink, rather than having to configure both separately.
Allowing Blink to manage LN but not on-chain transactions creates two separate balances.
Blink seems to only have LN receiving, but this effectively acts as a separate plugin for custodial balances, similar to Kraken's.
Perhaps it would be best to consolidate, with differing support for what is possible.
For example, even if Blink only exposes LN integration, the same plugin could allow on-chain transactions to be received by Kraken and LN transactions to be received by Blink, rather than having to configure both separately.