Closed Kunde21 closed 3 years ago
:+1:
I personally prefer underline
But I look in the source code now, and it seems like with the refactor, adding the underlines would be too much complexity for dubious benefit. (Currently, we just print ## on entering the node, which is much simpler)
I'm for simplicity :) let's keep it as hashes. (Maybe keep this as nice-to-have? I don't know)
Your PR makes sense. I am happy to make default whatever as well. Up to you (:
Hash and underline headers result in the same parsed structure, so we should be able to manage and generate both.
Other parsers will default to hash headers, so I feel okay defaulting to the same (merged in #13).
This leaves underline headers as an optional generation target. An option flag fits here as a solution to the bike-shedding problem.