search

Kylie309 / 2024-US-election-prediction

0 stars 0 forks source link

Peer Review #2 #3

Closed uma-tara closed 1 week ago

uma-tara commented 3 weeks ago

Positive Aspects: The repository is structured as required, and the overall organization of the paper is well thought out. There’s a clear plan for how the paper will be finalized. The figures provided give a glimpse into what looks like a well-constructed analysis and model, suggesting that the final version could turn out to be quite strong.

Evaluation & Estimated Mark:

1/1 for R Citation, 1/1 for Class Paper, 1/1 for LLM Statement, 1/2 for Title, could be a bit more of a specific one. 2/2 for Author, Date, and Repo 1/4 for Abstract, parts are missing. 2/4 for Introduction, not strong enough. you have time to revise/edit! 0/1 for Estimand, absent. 0/10 for Data, absent. 0/4 for Measurement, absent. 0/10 for Model, absent. 0/10 for Results, absent. 0/10 for Discussion, absent. 0/6 for Prose, absent. 0/1 for Cross-References, absent. 0/2 for Captions, absent. 1/4 for Graphs/Tables, only a few are available at this point. 0/10 for Idealized Methodology, absent. 0/4 for Idealized Survey, absent. 0/10 for Pollster Methodology, absent. 1/4 for Referencing, need to include more. 0/2 for Commits, absent. 0/2 for Sketches, absent. 0/4 for Simulation, absent. 0/4 for Test-Simulation, absent. 0/4 for Test-Actual, absent. 0/1 for Parquet, absent. 1/4 for Reproducible Workflow, needs to be further developed. 0/1 for Code Style, absent. 0/3 for General Excellence, absent.

Estimated Mark: 12/126

Kylie309 commented 1 week ago

Thank you very much for your comment! We have refined our paper and scripts and other files to make the study more complete.