This is a silly PR to address an open issue, but the over-under is that rpatchur already supports Azure Storage accounts. The files are presented as a HTTPS webserver, so it is transparent. However, the implementation may not be intuitive to users, consequently it may be desired to include a readme/sample implementation.
This PR includes an example for such an integration. It is expected that other storage accounts provided by other cloud service providers could be implemented in a similar fashion. It probably isn't our place to provide end-to-end documentation on deployment architectures/models, but an example for an alternative approach (with justifiable reasons, i.e. cost, performance), isn't too outlandish either.
This is a silly PR to address an open issue, but the over-under is that
rpatchuralready supports Azure Storage accounts. The files are presented as a HTTPS webserver, so it is transparent. However, the implementation may not be intuitive to users, consequently it may be desired to include a readme/sample implementation.This PR includes an example for such an integration. It is expected that other storage accounts provided by other cloud service providers could be implemented in a similar fashion. It probably isn't our place to provide end-to-end documentation on deployment architectures/models, but an example for an alternative approach (with justifiable reasons, i.e. cost, performance), isn't too outlandish either.