search

LABSS / PROTON-T

Simulation of recruitment to terrorism
MIT License
1 stars 2 forks source link

Calm #88

Closed mariopaolucci closed 5 years ago

mariopaolucci commented 5 years ago

The important changes here are the introduction of a control on criminal history, re-structuring of police intervention and of its weight.

police intervention

Here too the intervention makes 24 combinations, as it consists of 1/4 or 1/2 of police officers converted into CPOs.

Policemen are 4 per thousand (but how many hours do they work?) That makes up for 40 police officers. In the population in one year, the 23% has contact with police and 19.3% percent of those will have a negative effect on trust.

We implemented 4 per thousand police officers. To meet with the 23% of citizens in one year, we need them to act less than once a day. This means to calculate:

pb_to_act_per_day num-policemen 365 = 0.23 * num-citizens

pb_to_act_per_day = 0.23 * num-citizens / num-policemen / 365

pb_to_act_per_hour = pb_to_act_per_day / (num-hours-per-day - 1) = 0.23 * num-citizens / num-policemen / 365 / (num-hours-per-day - 1)

num-citizens / num-policemen = 1000 / 4

pb_to_act_per_hour = pb_to_act_per_day / (num-hours-per-day - 1) = 0.23 * 1000 / 4 / 365 / (num-hours-per-day - 1)

CPOs will seek places with people over radicalization threahold.

They will have an effect on trust scaling down of 1 (in the -2 to 2 scale) The inverse of that for police.

the intervention is all 40 police offfcers , 1/4, 1/2 of them converted to commmunity police officers.

digitaldust commented 5 years ago

btw, I love the name of this pull request