Closed akretchun closed 6 years ago
So, the logic we decided was: If < FWILimit1, then EffectiveLow If > FWILimit1 and < Limit 2, then EffectiveMed If > FWILimit2 and < Limit 3, then EffectiveHi What if > Limit 3? Do we need a third limit? Or can we substitute: If > FWILimit2, then EffectiveHi ? Should we call them 'limits' or 'breaks'?
I think we can leave it at 2 different limits, then if >FWILimit2, it will be EffectiveHi. I'm not really sure what >Limit 3 would mean in this context anyways.
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Robert Scheller notifications@github.com wrote:
Assigned #55 https://github.com/LANDIS-II-Foundation/Extension-SCRAPPLE/issues/55 to @akretchun https://github.com/akretchun.
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/LANDIS-II-Foundation/Extension-SCRAPPLE/issues/55#event-1405359228, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AM2OeAFcfCODMViI3ARxCsO0ghkuzoAsks5tF6xugaJpZM4Q-Nar .
-- Alec Kretchun
Coding completed and tested. See: Test_NECN_H.
Add functionality that increases suppression effectiveness as a threshold function of FWI. Need to define 3(?) Fwi thresholds that will bump up effectivesness levels
IgnType FWIlimit1 FWIlimit2 FWIlimit3 EffectivenessLow EffectivenessMed EffectivenessHi