Open nikolayilyin opened 3 years ago
@nikolayilyin this file is an LibreOffice sheet with errors count, let me know your thoughts
@norberto108 which beambranch and databranch are those based on? Did you see any errors as follows: 16:40:04.445 [main] ERROR com.conveyal.r5.streets.IntHashGrid - Visiting too many spatial index cells.
@Xuan-1998 I think it comes from master. And i didn't get any errors like that. Do you have any log files with this kind of errors ?
Check out this file beamLog.txt
Check out this file beamLog.txt
it is a candidate to be a WARN indeed
Check out this file beamLog.txt
it is a candidate to be a WARN indeed
cool, that sounds good
@nikolayilyin the new set of errors created from the recent runs Errors-1.ods
Great! Now let's keep more information about each error (the name of the class is not enough to judge) and let's not group the errors by simulation name (or branch name) - let's just have the errors and the amount of them
I joined all ERROR messages removing the numeric values from the files bellow in an unique result sheet:
./new-york-600k-june2022-calib-4_zneedellATgmail_com/beamLog.out
./0.1pop-no-car400_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog.out
./0.1pop-cheaper-bikes_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog.out
./0.1pop-nocar1600-twice-bikes_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog.out
./0.1pop-nocar1600-twice-bikes_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog_2.out
./0.1pop-more-bikes_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog.out
./0.1pop-fewer-bikes_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog.out
./0.1pop-fewer-docks_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog.out
./0.1pop-baseline-twice-bikes_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog.out
./new-york-600k-august2020-calib-4_zneedellATgmail_com/beamLog.out
./0.1pop-free-bikes_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog.out
./gemini-scenario-8-MaxEV-10p-TEST_10712736+htmlrbATusers_noreply_github_com/beamLog.out
./0.1pop-baseline_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog.out
./0.1pop-more-docks_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog.out
./new-york-600k-jan2022-calib-4_zneedellATgmail_com/beamLog.out
./0.1pop-no-shared-bikes_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog.out
./0.1pop-nocar1600_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog.out
./0.1pop-nocar1600_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog_1.out
./0.1pop-nocar1600_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog_2.out
./0.1pop-nocar400-twice-bikes_j503440616ATberkeley_edu/beamLog.out
It seems there is something wrong with grouping of errors, the following errors looks the same to me: There are other errors that looks the same as well.
Please, check if the grouping work
The fixed errors list errors-3.ods
Last review in 19-sep-2022 errors-3.ods
To try to find the error messages that could be replaced with warnings, i grouped the error messages removing the timestamp and process numbers to generic messages. Some of them are triggered from the frameworks out of scope. Attached is the errors sheet. errors-3.ods
Some of errors in the simulation output log are actually warnings because they are usually ignored. The goal of this issue is:
In order to achieve the first goal one needs to analyze actual output logs, I think the good idea is to use existing simulation output from our spreadsheet , especially the runs with big numbers in the
Error
column.For example: https://s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/beam-outputs/index.html#output/newyork/nyc-200k-baseline-04__2021-11-28_18-59-38_wvi https://s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/beam-outputs/index.html#output/newyork/nyc-200k-baseline-04__2021-11-28_17-32-45_ooc https://s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/beam-outputs/index.html#output/sfbay/smart-baseline-15k-FREIGHT__2021-11-29_14-33-42_lcm https://s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/beam-outputs/index.html#output/austin/austin-prod-200k-flowCap-0.2-speedScaling-1.1__2021-11-23_14-21-33_auf
or other recent runs