Closed cprato-qw closed 3 years ago
Hello,
I think this is related to the choice that was made in brightway2 to go with the IO notation and not the LCA notation (see "Getting the signs right" section here: https://2.docs.brightway.dev/intro.html).
Long story short, there is a relation T = I-A between the 2 notations (with I being the identity matrix) where T would be your classic technology matrix of ecoinvent, i.e., with 1s on the diagonal and negative values for the consumption of inputs elsewhere and where A is the technology matrix used in Input-Output (and the one chosen by AB/brightway2), i.e., with 0s on the diagonal and positive values for the consumption of inputs elsewhere
Ultimately, from what I understand, in AB you need to call negative flows of waste treatment, unlike in SimaPro, OpenLCA & co.
Thanks Maxime, i changed the sign in the process and i got the correct sign and separation of emissions in the outputs!
After importing ecoinvent 3.7, if i select treatment processes such as "treatment of municipal solid waste, unsanitary landfill, wet infiltration class (500mm) " and Impact category IPCC 2013, after LCA calculaton i get a result of -1.17
In my opinion this value should be positive
Moreover this result, if inspected in the EF contributions tab, is not separated between the GHGs, only the "Rest" column has a value