Closed rjyounes closed 6 years ago
Separate property groups have a domino effect and make it more difficult to define shared property shapes for, say, arm:markedBy - thought it can be done with sh:and - but it seems unnecessary unless the order needs to differ.
Need separate groups because the ordering of property shapes is different for Items and Instances - see issue #76 (now fixed and closed)
@sfolsom Can we combine ItemPhysicalDescriptionPropertyGroup and InstancePhysicalDescriptionPropertyGroup into PhysicalDescriptionPropertyGroup, since only one or the other will occur on an item or instance page? Can't the label just be "Physical Description"?