Closed rjyounes closed 6 years ago
Re: hasMeasurement: Should we just say: The relationship of a resource to a measurement?
Yes, that sounds good.
I am just noticing that isMeasurementOf actually has a range of MeasurementGroup. So shouldn't we make it the domain of hasMeasurement? Or leave the range open?
yes, you're right.
The first option or the 2nd?
Sorry - I wasn't clear. We wanted to leave the range of isMeasurementOf and domain of hasMeasurement open so that they could be used in other contexts, such as a Font having a Measurement without requiring a MeasurementGroup.
Ok. Done.
Definition of Measurement: would it be clearer to say "dimension" instead of "aspect"? I think I originally suggested "aspect" because "dimension" didn't seem to cover all cases (e.g., file size) but now I think it sounds awkward.
Definition of hasMeasurement: since the domain is unspecified, the definition should not refer to MeasurementGroup. It could be a MeasurementGroup, a Font, etc.
Definition of isMeasurementOf: same as above
Definition of isUnitOf: should be turned around - relationship between unit and measurement