search

LD4P / ld4ptemplates

Starter set of resource templates for sinopia, based on Library of Congress BFE Profiles (as they were in August 2019), updated for use by Sinopia LD4P2 cohort
2 stars 0 forks source link

add AdminMetadata RT to Work RT for monographs #40

Open NancyL opened 4 years ago

NancyL commented 4 years ago

ld4p:RT:bf2:Monograph:Work:Un-nested and ld4p:RT:bf2:Monograph:Work

There has been a request to add the admin metadata RT to Instance RTs. This is particularly valuable for un-nested templates, where the two templates are separated, but it may be the case even with a nested template that the admin metadata differs

NancyL commented 4 years ago

Do we want this for other RTs? (Cartographic, Rare Materials, Serials?)

NancyJean commented 4 years ago

Yes, I'll do this in the serials unnested RTs. I think we should add it to unnested Works too.

NancyL commented 4 years ago

So the question has changed somewhat. Do we want admin metadata un-nested as well? This way people could create individual templates for their institutions with defaults filled in.

RobertRohr commented 4 years ago

Hello, There’s something to be said for that approach. Besides setting defaults, one could also use an unnested template to provided admin metadata for works if we ever decide that’s desirable.

Robert

Robert J. Rohrbacher Metadata Librarian for Social Sciences and Government Documents Metadata Dept. Stanford University Libraries phone: 650-725-7992 fax: 650-725-1120 rrohrbac@stanford.edu

From: NancyL notifications@github.com Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 2:18 PM To: LD4P/ld4ptemplates ld4ptemplates@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [LD4P/ld4ptemplates] add AdminMetadata RT to Instance RT for monographs (#40)

So the question has changed somewhat. Do we want admin metadata un-nested as well? This way people could create individual templates for their institutions with defaults filled in.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/LD4P/ld4ptemplates/issues/40#issuecomment-601914735, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALOX3DBF7ESNP6LMI477BRLRIPMQRANCNFSM4KH7EAZQ.

NancyJean commented 4 years ago

I'm ok with this for all the above reasons -- being able to apply it as need is identified to Works, Instances, and Items and to facilitate local customized templates.

NancyL commented 4 years ago

In dev server. Since the name RT is shared with all provision activities, role appears with all of them.