Open sfolsom opened 5 years ago
@sfolsom When I perform a search using the test in #130, I see the expected result as the first result.
-
query: precious
position: 5
subject_uri: "http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300011054"
replacements:
maxRecords: '10'
This translates to API request...
https://lookup.ld4l.org/authorities/search/linked_data/getty_aat_ld4l_cache?q=precious&maxRecords=4
with results...
[
{"uri":"http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300011054","id":"300011054","label":"precious metal"},
{"uri":"http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300133732","id":"300133732","label":"precious stone (material)"},
{"uri":"http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300266077","id":"300266077","label":"mitrae pretiosae"},
{"uri":"http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300011175","id":"300011175","label":"[semi-precious stone, semiprecious stone]"}
]
Did you run the accuracy test and it reported different results?
weird, control-F for 'precious' in the following doc to see the Sinopia screenshot: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UxSeZ9xWpIZ__UxzMAtJGlXUrRzY-yZ3OukZNw2FDrg/edit?usp=sharing
for the needed extra space issue check out the screenshots for the Geonames searches in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UxSeZ9xWpIZ__UxzMAtJGlXUrRzY-yZ3OukZNw2FDrg/edit?usp=sharing
@sfolsom Can you review this issue and determine if it is still a problem? I believe this was an issue in Sinopia and not at QA or the cache.
For tracking purposes, please create a separate issue for each indexing improvement request.
We see this not just in AAT, but the test above should account for AAT, where we noticed it first.