Closed PedroGFonseca closed 6 years ago
Was the entry exam the same for everyone?
It was, however given that students had friends do the test for them having different tests would not have saved us
yeah let's see what Elena comes up for this one...
One option is to do an in person test, with limited amount of time, kinda like standardized tests (SAT, TOEFL, etc) do.
Im not a big fan though, but self reported solutions will not avoid cheating.
We could generate tests for each person. Or am I missing something?
@echo66 that would not really solve the issue, because (from what we understand) they had friends who knew python solve the problem for them
I don't see this being solved with tests being done without our supervision... It is really difficult to overcome. Possible solutions:
Slightly duplicated from #14 :
One way to discourage cheating might be to have the written exam remote, followed by a 5 minute oral exam over Skype. If they know they are going to be questioned, they will hesitate to ask a friend to do it for them. We can just ask basic questions they've already answered in their written form ("You used a for loop here, can you explain your reasoning?"). Should be pretty obvious if they didn't do it themselves.
Closing this thread to discuss it only on https://github.com/LDSSA/instructors-forum/issues/14 (got duplicated)
We have entry tests to ensure a sufficient level of Python. The first edition showed that we have a weakness in grading, as at least one student has obviously cheated to get in.
What measures can be taken to avoid teaching in future?