Closed vpicavet closed 7 years ago
@ldgeo free to comment. Note that we would still need an API for oriented images nontheless
Cubes are not the only option, changed the title to reflect this. Do we want to support different types of panoramic images or just one ?
Among the options :
For now, I propose to stick to the following (which is what I came across in the past)
I do not think we should distinguish assembled and unassembled panoramas. For me it is just images with varying field of views (eg a fisheye image is almost a panorama by itself...). An interesting api would be to be able to select based on position and field of view : frustum-based selection !
One resource which could be interesting to get an idea of the existing mass market hardware providing 360° images and video :
images and video examples :
This is old stuff. Closing for now.
It would be useful to have an API for cubic panoramic, just like HERE does.
The JS API is here (!) : https://developer.here.com/javascript-apis/documentation/v3/maps/topics/panorama.html
API call : getClosestPanoramas with : lat and lng
Response :
To get real images, there is a defined scheme for the URL :
Proposal :
/cubes/<id>
API entry point for cubes metadata with JSON response/cubes/tiles/<id>_r<lod>_f<face>_x<img_tile_x>_y<img_tile_y>.jpg
for jpg images