nus-pe-bot
commented
7 months ago Team's Response
The implementation is specified in the initial explanation of the function as shown here.
Furthermore, in the examples, there are examples illustrating clearly how the function works for other parameters (reference the 2nd example).
The explanation for tags is expanded upon in the following points as it is possible to have more than one tag (and so possible to have more than one tag match the same parameter) whereas it is not possible to have more than one of the other fields. However, this is a possible improvement to improve the clarity of the UG and so has been marked "Not in scope".
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.NotInScope]
- [ ] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
For the filter command feature, the user guide actually states that "All tags containing the words or part-thereof will be matched (e.g. Ba will return Badminton or Basketball or Football or Backgammon )" but does not state that other fields such as name, phone also follow this behaviour.
For example, "filter n/A" will filter all the person whose name contain A(or a). But this behaviour is not stated in UG. (The UG does state this behaviour for tag, but not other field).