Closed evanlinjin closed 1 year ago
Merging #160 (f846d7b) into mark-and-unmark-used (8438e30) will decrease coverage by
0.26%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
:mega: This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## mark-and-unmark-used #160 +/- ##
========================================================
- Coverage 65.89% 65.64% -0.26%
========================================================
Files 9 9
Lines 390 390
========================================================
- Hits 257 256 -1
- Misses 133 134 +1
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
bdk_chain/src/keychain/keychain_txout_index.rs | 0.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
bdk_chain/src/keychain.rs | 61.19% <100.00%> (-1.50%) |
:arrow_down: |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
Internally, this just uses
store_all_up_to
, however this will change once we start storing a "lookahead" index for each keychain.
I imagine that we will delete store_all_up_to
and apply_additions
will just take all its logic.
Can you make this PR to #154 instead?
I merged this into #154 already
Internally, this just uses
store_all_up_to
, however this will change once we start storing a "lookahead" index for each keychain.Additionally, I have removed
AsRef
andAsMut
implementations forDerivationAdditions
, andDerivationAdditions
now has a single fieldlast_derived
.This is my attempt at addressing https://github.com/LLFourn/bdk_core_staging/pull/154#issuecomment-1411479890