Closed Steven-Roberts closed 6 months ago
Is there any need to do outfile checking for this test? Isn't the return code of the test enough?
Is there any need to do outfile checking for this test? Isn't the return code of the test enough?
That's a good question, since I also do not fully understand the use of .out
files versus return flags in test/unit_tests
.
@Steven-Roberts A couple of follow-on items to this PR:
ARKodeButcherTable_ERKIDToName
and ARKodeButcherTable_DIRKIDToName
in the change log and recent changes.. versionadded: x.y.z
to the documentation for ARKodeButcherTable_ERKIDToName
and ARKodeButcherTable_DIRKIDToName
test/answers
commit to 2004a4042d8f730073bac084d601e083fca0c5bf
- Update the
test/answers
commit to2004a4042d8f730073bac084d601e083fca0c5bf
Actually, no need to update test/answers
the commit will be updated by #474
Ok, looks like I'll need a separate PR to do that now that this is merged.
.. versionadded: x.y.z
I always forget about this nice sphinx feature
Switches from a vector of table names (which was often not updated) to iterating over the enum of tables so methods get included in this test automatically.