Open jvoight opened 7 years ago
Is this the \sigma-\tau aligned notion? i.e. the Galois action on the base number field (which I suppose is Galois) and the choice of embedding of the Hecke eigenvalue field leave the form stable : a{\tau(\mathfrak{p}}=\sigma(a{\mathfrak{p})
Do you want to have a search on this? or add info on the pages?
I have computed this for "my" BMFs, i.e. the ones with rational eigenvalues. See for example http://beta.lmfdb.org/ModularForm/GL2/ImaginaryQuadratic/2.0.4.1/67600.6/d/ http://beta.lmfdb.org/ModularForm/GL2/ImaginaryQuadratic/2.0.4.1/16384.1/d/ http://beta.lmfdb.org/ModularForm/GL2/ImaginaryQuadratic/2.0.3.1/57967.9/a/ but to find some of these examples I needed to do a low-level search. I store a field 'bc' which is 0 for not-a-base-change-even-up-to-twist, >0 for base-change, <0 for twist-of-base-change, and the absolute value tells you the coefficient field of the underlying form.
Samuele: no, twisted base change means just that, a twist of a base change.
The "sigma-tau-aligned" notion we discussed in Oldenburg is something different: sometimes such forms will arise from twisted base change, sometimes not.
Got it, but I think both notions are important enough to deserve more visibility, i.e. searches and displays.
This notion is more general than base change on the nose and is important for all sorts of reasons.