Closed mavit closed 3 years ago
The reason why I chose v9 is that we have all the required binaries in LMS already. I hate building more if there's no/little demand. And as a Docker container is pretty much self-contained and running just one task, I believe we can live with this "risk" and move on as soon as we have more recent binaries available anyway.
I think the choice of Debian 9 is the cause of this problem with sox/wvunpack
It looks like the aarch64 sox/wvunpack binaries are built with a later glibc.
As I wrote in that thread we moved to Debian 10 for LMS 8.2, as you suggested in your edit (sorry, didn't see it, as I don't get edits via mail).
The container image is currently based on Debian 9, but the Debian project describe version 9 as “end of life”. Do we know if anything prevents us from using Debian 10?