Closed crisdut closed 1 year ago
Merging #61 (226d268) into master (a403e25) will decrease coverage by
0.0%
. The diff coverage is0.0%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #61 +/- ##
=======================================
- Coverage 0.1% 0.1% -0.0%
=======================================
Files 40 41 +1
Lines 3186 3317 +131
=======================================
Hits 3 3
- Misses 3183 3314 +131
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
cli/src/command.rs | 0.0% <0.0%> (ø) |
|
cli/src/main.rs | 6.7% <0.0%> (-3.3%) |
:arrow_down: |
cli/src/opts.rs | 0.0% <0.0%> (ø) |
|
rpc/src/client.rs | 0.0% <0.0%> (ø) |
|
rpc/src/error.rs | 0.0% <0.0%> (ø) |
|
rpc/src/lib.rs | 100.0% <ø> (ø) |
|
rpc/src/listen_addr.rs | 0.0% <0.0%> (ø) |
|
rpc/src/messages.rs | 0.0% <0.0%> (ø) |
|
rpc/src/service_id.rs | 0.0% <0.0%> (ø) |
|
src/automata.rs | 0.0% <ø> (ø) |
|
... and 49 more |
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
Is it that AddressCompat
doesn't support regtest? If not, it should - since it is a part of the address string; and I will look how to update it first.
AddressCompat
provides stronger guarantees that the address, once parsed, is supported by the wallet, that is why it is used here
Is it that
AddressCompat
doesn't support regtest? If not, it should - since it is a part of the address string; and I will look how to update it first.
AddressCompat
provides stronger guarantees that the address, once parsed, is supported by the wallet, that is why it is used here
Hi @dr-orlovsky,
I reverted the change and created a new PR related:
Please see my comments in https://github.com/BP-WG/descriptor-wallet/pull/64#issuecomment-1326431925
We need to decide upon that problem first
Details: https://github.com/orgs/LNP-BP/discussions/128