Closed trtomei closed 5 years ago
We have never applied cuts on CHF/NHF for fat jets. There are different opinions here, but when I explicitly studied those variables for fat jets back in 2016 I saw no discrepancy to be taken care of. I am aware that mono-V apply the same cuts for fat jets too, but I personally think there is no effect. We can study this more of course, but it crucial we correct narrow jets.
I included some more monojet ID cuts and restricted the eta to 2.4 in my last commit. I'm closing this.
Perfect!
From https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/JetID13TeVRun2018
Besides the "Tight" ID, we also add the NHF < 0.8 cut (from monojet analysis). Notice that the fat jet does not have NHF in NanoAOD it seems, so we cannot apply that. :( To be revisited.