Open trilis opened 3 months ago
Well, for my particular usecase actually main-interp/main-synterp solution worked perfectly, but I still can imagine the situation when one needs actual common library. For example, as synterp code mainly works with strings, it would be useful to use string manipulation library both in interp and synterp. But main-interp/main-synterp probably should be great for most of usecases.
So on the second thought, while this feature still would be useful, I suppose it's low-priority.
Suppose I have some "common utils" Db that I want to use both in interp and synterp code:
I would expect that I will be able to accumulate it like this:
However, this command fails in synterp, not being able to find
f
. The solution I found is to make two copies of utils, one with#[synterp]
tag, and then accumulate them twice, again once with#[synterp]
. This solution works, but it isn't pretty. Is it possible to implement Db sharing? If it's hard, then just allowing to copy Db will remove the need to duplicate code, something like: