What has Twinkles ever done for us?

[drphilmarshall]

Possible CI meeting topic, arising from discussion with @richardxdubois . Short talks from various people on infrastructure work done for Twinkles. Good idea?

[richardxdubois]

Indeedy. We'd talked about how to spread the lessons learned from Twinkles to the WGs. It seemed like a summary at a CI meeting, with WG members alerted, and then visit WG meetings afterwards would be a good idea. We can target the upcoming May 2 CI meeting for this.

Topics to cover can be:

• repo organization and setup, including cookiecutter
• Travis CI use
• common software installs at NERSC
• use of workflow engine tools
• early object database experience

What else? Anything from how the simulation/DM pipeline is set up and customized?

Main speakers so far are @jchiang87 @heather999 @tony-johnson.

[drphilmarshall]

I can give a very quick demo of how we are attempting to use the GitHub/ZenHub project management tools

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Richard Dubois notifications@github.com wrote:

Indeedy. We'd talked about how to spread the lessons learned from Twinkles to the WGs. It seemed like a summary at a CI meeting, with WG members alerted, and then visit WG meetings afterwards would be a good idea. We can target the upcoming May 2 CI meeting for this.

Topics to cover can be:

-

repo organization and setup, including cookiecutter

Travis CI use

common software installs at NERSC

use of workflow engine tools

early object database experience

What else? Anything from how the simulation/DM pipeline is set up and customized?

Main speakers so far are @jchiang87 https://github.com/jchiang87 @heather999 https://github.com/heather999 @tony-johnson https://github.com/tony-johnson.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/DarkEnergyScienceCollaboration/ComputingInfrastructure/issues/18#issuecomment-213997192

[heather999]

Likely completed a long time ago