Closed yymao closed 4 years ago
@yymao Was your proposal accepted? If yes, can we close this issue, if no, can we resolve this question and then close the issue? Thanks!
@wmwv, what do you think? I think the current names are still not very informative. But since there's a README, I am also ok if we just want to keep them as is.
This ticket remains a thing that would be useful. We should change them someday, but it's never really a priority.
I think this is an example of an Issue that doesn't really need to be closed but is unlikely to get done in the near future. Unfortunately we lack a better work-tracking system that allows for low-priority tickets to hang around in an easy to manage (i.e., largely ignore) way.
This issue is solved in a different way. As we have moved to parquet-based object catalogs, these old scripts are no longer used (but they are not removed from the repo).
Here's the list of the corresponding new scripts:
merge_tract_cat.py
-> deprecated. Use make_object_catalog.py
instead. trim_tract_cat.py
-> deprecated. No need to trim object catalogs in parquet format.convert_merged_tract_to_dpdd.py
-> deprecated. Use write_gcr_to_parquet.py
instead.
The filenames of some of the data curation/conversion scripts sitting under
/scripts
are not very clear/informative. I suggest we rename them to make their purpose more clear.Here's one proposal:
merge_tract_cat.py
->merge_deepCoadd_into_object_cat.py
trim_tract_cat.py
->trim_object_cat_columns.py
convert_merged_tract_to_dpdd.py
->convert_gcr_object_cat_to_general_formats.py