Closed wmwv closed 5 years ago
If the question is about the scripts README, I think it can be improved indeed :
HTH
I guess we could clean it to include only the general (and up-to-date) instructions, and create a different file to document the exact procedure used for each run/version. Is this related to what you're thinking of?
Yes, that's exactly the tension I'm concerned about. I think this is in part why @johannct isn't happy with the current README. It's useful guide to what was done, but it's not a full recreation of exactly what was done. It's also very much centered around doing things at NERSC.
This isn't going to be a complete re-working. But for this ticket I'll
tables
as a pretty key Python dependency that can easily not be in an install.GCRCatalogs
and gcr-catalogs
as a DESC-specific dependencies.In a future ticket, @johannct can add instructions for how to run these at IN2P3.
@johannct
I iterate here a remark I made before : it is not super pleasant to create products in-place, id est to be forced to do cd $WORKDIR in order to have the outputs be saved in $WORKDIR. I got tricked by that once, forgetting to move back outputs that had been produced in-place..... in a node scratch space that got deleted at the end of a batch job.
I think I understand the complaint, but what's your suggestion for positive action?
ah sorry, just a --outdir option maybe?
ah sorry, just a --outdir option maybe?
Sounds reasonable to me. https://github.com/LSSTDESC/DC2-production/issues/322
Run 1.2p files prepared and installed. DPDD versions prepared. README updated.
I'm particularly interested in suggestions for making the README clearer.