Closed SimonKrughoff closed 7 years ago
I think this is something @rbiswas4 can do straightforwardly. How do we manage these visit lists, by the way? Are they checked in somewhere in this Twinkles repo, or just emailed to Tony and then written about? Or is the code that makes the selection checked in? Probably this latter option is a good idea, in case we all get hit by buses.
@SimonKrughoff I am happy to do whatever is required, but I am trying to understand what are the contents of the input files you are seeking: Is it obsHistIDs for the year 1 runs that have already been done (ie. not part of long jobs, and failed jobs?) and non year 1 runs for science images?
@drphilmarshall In previous cases I checked code into the Twinkles repo.
@rbiswas4 I think obsHistIDs for year 1 in one file and all the rest in another file would be good enough.
@SimonKrughoff You want the ones that failed removed correct?
@rbiswas4 I don't know what "ones" and "failed" are in this context.
@SimonKrughoff The split files are Twinkles_1.3_first_year.csv and Twinkles_1.3_other_years.csv in the zip file. Not sure what a sensible way of adding the code for this is .
Thanks, Rahul!
I count
2661 Twinkles_1.3_first_year.csv
21495 Twinkles_1.3_other_years.csv
which looks about right. Deep drilling fields, eh? So many visits.
Right. All of the failed visits were in the last 9 years so if none of our runs had crashed we would have 21514 in the last file.
@rbiswas4 why would we not just include all the ids? I understand some crashed, but I'd rather fix that than leave them off the list.
OK here is your list of obsHistIDs without removing failures. splitvisits.zip
I think this is closed. If there is something left, please let me know.
In order to do the Level 1 reprocessing workflow we will build a template with the year 1 data and difference the remaining years against that year one data. This means we need different input files for the coadd building and differencing steps. I think Rahul signed up to do this, but could be wrong.