Open dladams opened 8 months ago
I see small discrepancies between the task state counts reported by g3wfpipe and those found by the monexp notebook.
E.g. in run 1930, progress.log contains
... 32: Running. Found parsl pickle file. 42: Running. Finished 0 of 2985 tasks. 2985 pending. 52: Running. Finished 0 of 2985 tasks. 2910 pending. 11 launched. 64 running. 63: Running. Finished 0 of 2985 tasks. 2910 pending. 11 launched. 64 running. 73: Running. Finished 0 of 2985 tasks. 2910 pending. 11 launched. 64 running. 84: Running. Finished 0 of 2985 tasks. 2910 pending. 11 launched. 64 running. 94: Running. Finished 0 of 2985 tasks. 2910 pending. 11 launched. 64 running. 104: Running. Finished 0 of 2985 tasks. 2910 pending. 11 launched. 64 running. ...
While the isr curve in the monexp "running Task Count" plot has these values:
0 0.000000 1 0.000000 2 0.000000 3 0.000000 4 0.000000 5 0.000000 6 0.000000 7 44.109747 8 75.000000 9 75.000000 10 75.000000 11 75.000000 12 75.000000
in its first few monitoring lines and the recently updated monexp notebook show 117 running isr tasks at the start of then job. The time stamps in the isr stderr logs agree with the latter value, i.e. 117 tasks start in the first few seconds.
I see small discrepancies between the task state counts reported by g3wfpipe and those found by the monexp notebook.
E.g. in run 1930, progress.log contains
While the isr curve in the monexp "running Task Count" plot has these values:
in its first few monitoring lines and the recently updated monexp notebook show 117 running isr tasks at the start of then job. The time stamps in the isr stderr logs agree with the latter value, i.e. 117 tasks start in the first few seconds.