Closed jmeyers314 closed 8 months ago
Jim, how does this instrument name choice match up with the desire to have a new instrument for the rehearsal with ITL constants?
Do you want to do this first and then make a new PR for that? Or do you want to have this as the default for when we get real constants and then make a new instrument just for the temporary usage?
Jim, how does this instrument name choice match up with the desire to have a new instrument for the rehearsal with ITL constants?
Do you want to do this first and then make a new PR for that? Or do you want to have this as the default for when we get real constants and then make a new instrument just for the temporary usage?
We'd probably need to iterate with various people on a separate simulated ComCam model, so I'd be inclined to move forward with this, relying for now on the existing LSSTComCam model for testing, then make everything consistent with the final conventions, etc. after that process. I don't think using ComCam
here along with the existing model should be a problem as long as we use test repos for these data until things have finalized.
Great thanks.
Adds support for ComCam.
Note, possibly only works on
main
branches ofbatoid
andbatoid_rubin
at the moment. I had a bug in my ComCam optics yaml where both the camera and the camera+telescope were namedComCam
. This collision meant when you tried to rotate the camera, you ended up rotating the entire telescope instead. Will be fixed in a point release soonish...