codecov[bot]
commented
12 months ago Codecov Report
All modified lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
97322f5) 100.00% compared to head (8eaabd3) 100.00%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #195 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 34 34 Lines 2284 2284 ========================================= Hits 2284 2284 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/LSSTDESC/qp/pull/195/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/LSSTDESC/qp/pull/195/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
The unit tests that were protecting the machinery in the
quant_pdfmodule were mixed in with the unit tests associated with the mathematical functionality of various ensembles.It could be fine to have these together, but since the the machinery logic for quant_pdf is currently unique to that class, I felt like it would be ok to separate it from the other ensemble unit tests.