A personal reminder to go back and address the uncovered code in dsps_sed_modeler.py and dsps_photometry_creator.py, as my directory renaming PR indirectly reduced the codecoverage for these files (pragma-no-covers temporarily added in commits 438319a and d0d5730)
Additionally, Alex has identified that these (as well as the third item in the galaxy_modelling dir, galaxy_population_components.py) as being better off in the engines directory, so I will move them while investigating their code coverage.
Edit [Apr 26]: the codecov report for rail's current main branch now shows 100%, even with the removal of these temporary pragma: no cover's.
Including the codecov report for PR #325 with only 98.72% coverage for archival purposes (do we have race conditions or some other kind of non-determinism in the dsps tests?), but unless this occurs again, it will be considered low priority.
A personal reminder to go back and address the uncovered code in
dsps_sed_modeler.pyanddsps_photometry_creator.py, as my directory renaming PR indirectly reduced the codecoverage for these files (pragma-no-covers temporarily added in commits 438319a and d0d5730)Additionally, Alex has identified that these (as well as the third item in the galaxy_modelling dir,
galaxy_population_components.py) as being better off in theenginesdirectory, so I will move them while investigating their code coverage.Edit [Apr 26]: the codecov report for rail's current main branch now shows 100%, even with the removal of these temporary
pragma: no cover's.Including the codecov report for PR #325 with only 98.72% coverage for archival purposes (do we have race conditions or some other kind of non-determinism in the dsps tests?), but unless this occurs again, it will be considered low priority.