Issue/359/dsps v3.0.0

[eacharles]

I pulled in the changes from main, so that there aren't conflicts anymore.

But we probably want to figure out something else to do about the files in src/rail/examples_data/creation_data/data/dsps_default_data it looks like those are 59 MB, which seems really big for a code repo.

We have some examples use setting up examples to curl data from NERSC, we could do that here.

I guess the filter files are pretty small, but src/rail/examples_data/creation_data/data/dsps_default_data/ssp_data_fsps_v3.2_lgmet_age.h5 is about 58 MB.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (83d002a) 100.00% compared to head (cab3aec) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #366 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 40 40 Lines 2860 2860 ========================================= Hits 2860 2860 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[torluca]

Hi @eacharles , I followed your suggestions and implemented the following changes:

• pull latest changes from main
• curl ssp templates from public lsst directory and removed the templates in the examples_data folder
• fix the issues with the unit tests
• removed the dsps_reqs.txt file, since now dsps is pip installable and does not require diffstar and diffmah to be git cloned If you think that everything is alright, then you can approve the review :) Grazie mille!