Issue/136/build pipeline

eacharles commented 4 months ago

Problem & Solution Description (including issue #)

Code Quality

[ ] My code follows the code style of this project
[ ] I have written unit tests or justified all instances of #pragma: no cover; in the case of a bugfix, a new test that breaks as a result of the bug has been added
[ ] My code contains relevant comments and necessary documentation for future maintainers; the change is reflected in applicable demos/tutorials (with output cleared!) and added/updated docstrings use the NumPy docstring format
[ ] Any breaking changes, described above, are accompanied by backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings

codecov[bot] commented 4 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 98.37%. Comparing base (bb064dd) to head (507837c).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #137 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 98.25% 98.37% +0.12% ========================================== Files 41 43 +2 Lines 2177 2343 +166 ========================================== + Hits 2139 2305 +166 Misses 38 38 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

ztq1996 commented 4 months ago

This PR corresponds to this design doc:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_4l00MFPL8voBGNk08_fV61tf51U48i28j5LpydIdWk/edit?usp=sharing

LSSTDESC / rail_base