User/joselotl/redshift col

The modifications allow the evaluations to be run and written for the trainz and fzboost estimators. I don't know why, but the simpleNN and KNN are not working yet.

Change Description

[ ] My PR includes a link to the issue that I am addressing

Solution Description

Code Quality

[ ] I have read the Contribution Guide
[ ] My code follows the code style of this project
[ ] My code builds (or compiles) cleanly without any errors or warnings
[ ] My code contains relevant comments and necessary documentation

Project-Specific Pull Request Checklists

Bug Fix Checklist

[ ] My fix includes a new test that breaks as a result of the bug (if possible)
[ ] My change includes a breaking change
- [ ] My change includes backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings (if possible)

New Feature Checklist

[ ] I have added or updated the docstrings associated with my feature using the NumPy docstring format
[ ] I have updated the tutorial to highlight my new feature (if appropriate)
[ ] I have added unit/End-to-End (E2E) test cases to cover my new feature
[ ] My change includes a breaking change
- [ ] My change includes backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings (if possible)

Documentation Change Checklist

[ ] Any updated docstrings use the NumPy docstring format

Build/CI Change Checklist

[ ] If required or optional dependencies have changed (including version numbers), I have updated the README to reflect this
[ ] If this is a new CI setup, I have added the associated badge to the README

Other Change Checklist

[ ] Any new or updated docstrings use the NumPy docstring format.
[ ] I have updated the tutorial to highlight my new feature (if appropriate)
[ ] I have added unit/End-to-End (E2E) test cases to cover any changes
[ ] My change includes a breaking change
- [ ] My change includes backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings (if possible)

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (4a78ef0) 95.40% compared to head (bb92b92) 95.40%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #40 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 95.40% 95.40% ======================================= Files 31 31 Lines 1588 1590 +2 ======================================= + Hits 1515 1517 +2 Misses 73 73 ``` | [Files Changed](https://app.codecov.io/gh/LSSTDESC/rail_base/pull/40?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [src/rail/evaluation/evaluator.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/LSSTDESC/rail_base/pull/40?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC#diff-c3JjL3JhaWwvZXZhbHVhdGlvbi9ldmFsdWF0b3IucHk=) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | |

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

LSSTDESC / rail_base