Evaluation stages

[eacharles]

Problem & Solution Description (including issue #)

Code Quality

• [ ] My code follows the code style of this project
• [ ] I have written unit tests or justified all instances of #pragma: no cover; in the case of a bugfix, a new test that breaks as a result of the bug has been added
• [ ] My code contains relevant comments and necessary documentation for future maintainers; the change is reflected in applicable demos/tutorials (with output cleared!) and added/updated docstrings use the NumPy docstring format
• [ ] Any breaking changes, described above, are accompanied by backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.63574% with 10 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 98.39%. Comparing base (ebdc0c3) to head (41ad8c5).

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/rail/estimation/summarizer.py	56.52%	10 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #98 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 96.78% 98.39% +1.60% ========================================== Files 31 35 +4 Lines 1586 1926 +340 ========================================== + Hits 1535 1895 +360 + Misses 51 31 -20 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[hangqianjun]

Thanks for all the work! It looks good to me!