LSSTDESC / rail_pipelines

Collection of RAIL-based data analysis pipelines
MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

Eac/new dirs #10

Closed eacharles closed 1 year ago

codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (bae9d2a) 98.57% compared to head (02095f7) 98.57%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #10 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 98.57% 98.57% ======================================= Files 3 3 Lines 70 70 Branches 3 3 ======================================= Hits 69 69 Misses 1 1 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `98.57% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Impacted Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/LSSTDESC/rail_pipelines/pull/10?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [...rail/pipelines/examples/goldenspike/goldenspike.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/LSSTDESC/rail_pipelines/pull/10?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC#diff-c3JjL3JhaWwvcGlwZWxpbmVzL2V4YW1wbGVzL2dvbGRlbnNwaWtlL2dvbGRlbnNwaWtlLnB5) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | |

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.