search

LSSTDESC / rail_pipelines

Collection of RAIL-based data analysis pipelines
MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

Update pyproject.toml - add pz-rail-cmnn #22

Closed OliviaLynn closed 12 months ago

OliviaLynn commented 1 year ago

Should fix rail's smoke test failure

codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (306e28a) 98.61% compared to head (78ae79f) 98.61%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #22 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 98.61% 98.61% ======================================= Files 3 3 Lines 72 72 Branches 3 3 ======================================= Hits 71 71 Misses 1 1 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/LSSTDESC/rail_pipelines/pull/22/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/LSSTDESC/rail_pipelines/pull/22/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC) | `98.61% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.