Closed EiffL closed 6 years ago
Would it be safer to edit the get_hasKnots()
method in CatalogClass.py
to be
def get_hasKnots(self):
has_disk = self.column_by_name('hasDisk').astype(float)
imag = self.column_by_name('mag_i_lsst')
return np.where(np.logical_and(np.isfinite(has_disk), imag<=KNOTS_MAG_CUTOFF), has_disk, np.NaN)
I'm worried about what the InstanceCatalog will look like if hasDisk==1
but knot flux is zero. In theory the magNorm
for the knots should come back as a NaN, in which case the knots would be omitted, but I'm not sure of that.
Or is it that the disk SED fluxes in cosmoDC2_v0.1_image_addon_knots
have already been adjusted and we need to undo that?
@jchiang87 This is ready for you to look at. It works. Flux is conserved to one part in 10**7 in the case where knots are removed
@danielsf @jchiang87 I have implemented a quick and dirty fix, I'm running out of time to refine it. Basically, it will not modify the flux of the disks if the galaxy is faint enough, and set 0 flux to the knots. I hope ImSim will be able to simply discard these 0 flux entries. @danielsf Do you think this will work ok ? Also, I would need you advice on the best way to pass the magnitude limit to the code, right now it's hardcoded.
This hasn't be tested yet!