Closed drphilmarshall closed 8 years ago
I agree that we punt on ipynb etc for another issue.
Sounds good - lets put lsstdesc.bib
in texmf/bib
then.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Alex Drlica-Wagner < notifications@github.com> wrote:
@kadrlica commented on this pull request.
In {{cookiecutter.folder_name}}/Makefile https://github.com/DarkEnergyScienceCollaboration/start_paper/pull/38:
@@ -36,12 +37,17 @@ tabdir=./tables tables=$(tabdir)/.tex styles=./texmf/styles/.{sty,cls} bibs=./texmf/bib/*.bst -source=$(main).{tex,bbl,bib} lsstdesc.bib macros.tex authors.tex acknowledgments.tex +source=$(main).{tex,bbl,bib} lsstdesc.bib authors.tex acknowledgments.tex
People will see that it is included in \bibliography{lsstdesc,main}, and we can add some comments (both in main.tex and main.bib) hinting where the file is located. I think that according to the natural structure of the project it should be in texmf/bib.
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/DarkEnergyScienceCollaboration/start_paper/pull/38, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AArY90T0tRySStZyg6tAUaJUK2QDDaLAks5q_TRegaJpZM4K1l56 .
The Makefile still only makes tex-format notes, but we at least now have a default format specified, so that
make
build an ApJ paper if that's all you ever want to do. I say we punt themake
-ing of ipynb, md and rst files for another issue. What do you think, @kadrlica ? This is ready for review, IMO.