Closed rbiswas4 closed 6 years ago
This actually relates to desc-tex
, since lsstdesc.bib
now resides there.
I don't know what the DPDD is, but if it's a published DESC document then by all means it should be added to lsstdesc.bib
. There is no ongoing effort to keep the bib up to date currently; we're dependent on pull requests from users. (Eventually, it may be updated automatically from a database, but we're not there yet.)
DPDD is the Project's Data Products Definition Document, a very useful
thing to be able to cite. It lives at http://ls.st/LSE-163
It might be better in an lsst.bib
file though - does the Project maintain
such a thing? Worth looking for this first, before making our own.
Thanks @abmantz : I did not realize this was in desc_tex
, and I am guessing that is because I followed the instructions of deploying as a zip file, and behind the scenes, this must have downloaded desc_tex
components. Following your point I will take the discussion to desc_tex and close this issue.
Re-opening. Let's submodule lsst-texmf
, which contains LSST Project bib files, in the same way as we handle desc-tex
.
I've just implemented this in commit 54c88f6 to deploy
. make lsst-texmf
will download the whole named repo, including bib files, and the Makefile
instructs latex to look for bib files in the right place. Unlike desc-tex
, I didn't make cloning of lsst-texmf
automatic - this could be changed, but it's annoyingly big (>25MB).
I am trying to include references to the DPDD and notice that it is not already in
lsstdesc.bib
. Obviously, I can just keep these inmain.bib
but I was wondering if we should be putting them inlsstdesc.bib
for future use.