codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch and project coverage have no change.
Comparison is base (
049524c) 100.00% compared to head (5155e36) 100.00%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #62 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 8 8 Lines 605 605 ========================================= Hits 605 605 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/LSSTDESC/tables_io/pull/62?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [src/tables\_io/types.py](https://codecov.io/gh/LSSTDESC/tables_io/pull/62?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC#diff-c3JjL3RhYmxlc19pby90eXBlcy5weQ==) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC):umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
I successfully tested the read function using .parquet and .parq files. However, I was not able to make pytest work with the test files, but I suspect the reason is not related to my commits. One source of error was the lack of a dependency (jaxlib). So I included it in the requirements list. Then the next pytest errors seem to be due to test data not being found.